The increased frequency of extreme weather events is causing some insurers to reduce the coverage they can afford to offer.

In the US, the states of Florida and California are in the headlines. But the impact of weather is broader than coastal communities and includes severe convective storms, hurricanes, floods and wildfires all over the world.

More on Insurance

More on Insurance

保険

BCGの保険業界コンサルティングチームは、世界中の保険会社が革新的な戦略を策定し、トランスフォーメーションに着手するのを支援しています。

損害保険

The property & casualty insurance industry responds to economic conditions & customer preferences by transforming operations. Learn how BCG can help.

The So What

Faced with increased loss costs, insurers must balance the need to preserve capital to pay policyholders’ claims with increased demand for coverage on these perils.

The difference between total economic loss and what’s covered by insurance products is often called the protection or coverage gap.

Consider these figures from Aon’s 2023 Weather, Climate and Catastrophe Report:

• Natural disasters caused global economic losses of about $313 billion in 2022. 
• Less than half ($132 billion) of this amount was insured. 
• This creates an insurance protection gap of 58%.

“As well as increasing the vulnerability and suffering of individuals, the protection gap is also a key indicator of economic and societal resilience. Working to narrow it is essential,” says BCG Managing Director and Partner Nadine Moore, who specializes in property and casualty lines.

“The scale of losses from climate disasters means that insurers are unable to shoulder the burden alone. However, the insurance industry has huge expertise in finding innovative ways to both mitigate and transfer risk.”

Now What

According to Moore:

Advanced Risk Modelling. The insurance industry has a long history of modeling risk and working with regulators to create fair and effective products to transfer risk. As governments and regulators tackle the climate-related coverage gap, it will be important to have insurers at the table to share expertise. And with the explosion of AI, the industry can innovate to create new solutions on the topic of climate risk at an even faster pace.

Spreading the Load.

• Catastrophe bonds and insurance-linked securities are one method of transferring risk to investors. This market could be expanded to fill the gap in new ways, potentially with government capital to support the sector too. 
• Parametric insurance—where payouts are triggered when pre-agreed parameters are met—is another example of managing risk. This could be employed around certain rainfall or windspeed, for instance. Parametric risk allows claim payments to be released much faster when disaster strikes, which in turn means the scale of the damage can often be limited. One way of innovating here, would be to deconstruct the traditional architecture of home insurance, so that uncovered perils become a parametric element within the broader insurance package. 
• Public-Private Partnerships. There are already insurance structures that rely on public funds, such as Flood Re in the UK and the terrorism reinsurance program in the US. These programs should be examined for possible expansion into other areas to help support the coverage gap.

New Government-Supported Programs. There will continue to be geographies where the industry needs to find an appropriate balance of risk and return. These are the areas seeing price increases at present. Governments may need to consider new alternatives where insurance is becoming increasingly expensive. Recent disasters are a call to action for insurers to team with governments to build new programs that complement current insurance products.

Long-term Risk Reduction. Building regulators and city planners also have a role to play in ensuring new building standards limit damage. For example, roof design and construction can be an effective mechanism in reducing the extent of wind or fire damage. These techniques take time to implement and may require funding support.