Ambidexterity

Your Strategy Needs a Strategy

ysnas-01-01-web-tcm9-178095.jpg

What

Ambidexterity is the ability to apply multiple approaches to strategy either concurrently or successively, since many firms operate in more than one strategic environment at once. Ambidexterity is not another color on the strategy palette; it is a technique for using the five approaches to strategy in combination with one another. The four approaches to ambidexterity—separation, switching, self-organization, and external ecosystems—depend on the degree of diversity and dynamism of the environment.

When

Most large businesses operate in multiple environments that change quickly over time—spanning many increasingly diverse geographies and product categories—and that are supported by a wide range of enabling functions. This diversity requires firms to be ambidextrous, because no single approach to strategy is applicable to a large firm in its entirety and over time.

How

The right approach to ambidexterity depends on how many different environments the firm faces (diversity) and how often those environments change (dynamism). A separation approach means that different approaches to strategy are managed top-down and are run independently from one another in different divisions or geographies. Firms applying a switching approach manage a common pool of resources that switch among the five approaches to strategy. Self-organization means that each unit chooses the best approach to strategy. In an ecosystem approach, firms source different approaches to strategy externally through players that specialize in the needed approach.

Biology and Strategy: The Giraffe
Ambidexterity in the business world means simultaneously exploiting and exploring, or running and reinventing, a business. Animals have used this mechanism for millions of years to forage for food effectively, and they must consider the same essential trade-off that companies do: whether to exploit the current environment or to go beyond the current environment and explore the unknown.

Giraffes, for example, employ clear and distinct approaches for balancing this trade-off. When food is abundant, as it usually is in the wet season, they don’t need a targeted strategy—there’s plenty of low-hanging fruit. In the dry season, however, giraffes need an explicit strategy for how frequently and how far away they should search for food sources, since staying too long at one grove will reduce yield and leave them too hungry to find the next food source. On the other hand, spending too much time wandering around looking for food will also make them vulnerable to starvation. Businesses, too, need to balance exploiting and renewing their advantage, especially when their current source of advantage is threatened due to technological change or competition. “Low-hanging fruit” for businesses is scarcer than ever, and they need deliberate approaches to achieving ambidexterity.
Nature is rife with examples of mutually beneficial shaping strategies, like the co-evolution of species and animals feeding on, and simultaneously dispersing, plant seeds.

More on Ambidexterity

Business strategist Knut Haanaes shares insights on how to strike a balance between perfecting what we already know and exploring totally new ideas—and lays out how to avoid two major strategy traps.
Ambidexterity—the ability to excel simultaneously in efficiency and innovation—is a rare but increasingly critical asset in today’s complex business environment.
Some of today’s most dynamic companies compete in a fundamentally new way. They leverage evolvable algorithms, which self-tune to accumulated knowledge and changing circumstances.
BCG's interactive guide shows the many strategy traps that can be encountered when balancing exploration and exploitation.

Eight Roles of Leadership

Leaders of successful organizations must select, combine, and effectively implement the appropriate combination of strategic approaches and adjust it dynamically as circumstances change.